So, yesterday Kristy-Leigh Minehan posted on Twitter that a company named Canaan announced an ASIC that is capable of 0.68W/Mhs

That’s 2200Mh/s running at 1500w

Here is a list of how it compares to other ASICs and GPUs.

She used this tweet to promote the need for ProgPoW

Today, I am attempting to explain that Canaan is not a threat to centralize Ethereum mining with their ASICs.

First, I cannot find any information regarding Canaan announcing an Ethereum ASIC other than Kristy’s twitter post

There is only one article written about it and it uses Kristy’s twitter post as their source.

Nothing on Canaan’s website talks about this miner

Nor does Canaan’s twitter account mention anything like this.

If we look closely at Kristy’s twitter picture, you can see the Canaan Ethereum miner will be called the V10.

I cannot find any info anywhere on this miner.

You would think that if Canaan is unveiling a new product, they would be talking about it more to spread awareness and raise hype, but they aren’t.

I mean, they made a big to-do when they announced the A10 bitcoin miner in March, so why are they posting nothing about the V10 ethereum miner.

And a google search will show many many more articles written about the bitcoin A10 after its announcement.

I’m not saying the announcement isn’t real, just that I find it odd that the company isn’t talking about it themselves.

Canaan did respond to a tweet from “cryptoState”, the writer’s of the article based on Kristy’s tweet.

Canaan replied that the v10 is not an official worldwide Canaan product.

and further in the cryptostate article, Canaan says “It is a little hard to explain, but those are not products designed and built by Canaan engineering. They are products sold by the domestic sales team and are not an official worldwide Canaan product,”

I do not know what that means exactly. If it means it’s not an official Canaan product, or that it won’t be available worldwide, or what.

But this is the first clue to me that it isn’t anything to worry about.

If it’s not an official Canaan product, then it doesn’t seem like it will have support from Canaan to bring it to market.

It won’t be marketed by Canaan, use it’s supply chain, it’s business resources and contacts, use it’s support system, or be built by Canaan.

Next, yes 0.68W/Mhs is more efficient than GPUs, but that isn’t all that matters when miners choose the devices to use.

What matters also is how much the machine costs.

If the V10 is price too high, then it’s not something to worry about.

Without a price, Kristy can’t claim in good faith that the V10 is something Ethereum needs to worry about and a reason ProgPoW needs to be adopted.

I’m not sure how to price the thing, myself, but at current ETH prices and hashrate, it would make $2200 in 4 months.

I think generally ASIC mfgs price their machines to break even in 3-4 months.

So that would be the machine will cost around $2200.

BUT, that’s only if ONE machine is running on the network.

The more machines on the network, the less profitable they are.

If we look at the Avalon A1066, it’s november batch costs $1390, and has a break-even time of 464 months at current bitcoin prices.

So it seems to me the Canaan V10 will be quite a bit more expensive than $2200.

Which doesn’t make it feasible for that many people to buy.

Next, there was no product on display at the New Era Mining Summit, where this product was announced.

Only some graphics of numbers they claim.

Nor can I find any technical documentation talking about how they plan to achieve the advertised hashrate

I tweeted Kristy telling her that this seems, at best, like just an idea to me, to help them raise money and that it takes more than an idea to bring an ASIC to market.

Kristy then blocked me on Twitter and told me to stop spreading misinformation.

View post on

So, now let’s talk about the article I replied to her with, claiming that Canaan doesn’t have enough funding for this.

Granted, I said this without doing as much research as I could’ve, but let’s see if what I said holds true.

Here is the article I linked in the tweet.

Avalon Bitcoin Miner Maker Canaan Is Plotting Another IPO Attempt

Notice the date this article was published. March 27th 2019.

Notice that Avalon announce their Bitcoin A10 miner the next day.

Perhaps to help attract funding from new investors, which the Coindesk article says they haven’t been able to bring on any new investors in a long time.

I’m not going to cite the whole article here, read it for yourself, but it generally explains that Canaan is unable to attract new funding.

Also, Xianfu Lui, a 17.2% shareholder in Canaan left the company in February, so I doubt he invested money into Canaan.

Co-Founder Quits Avalon Mining Chip Maker Canaan Over ‘Differences’

Here are some more Coindesk articles speaking about Canaan trying to raise money.

Huobi Plans Backdoor IPO Attempt in Hong Kong, Document Suggests

“After mining giant Bitmain’s IPO attempt in Hong Kong was allowed to expire, apparently due to reluctance from HKEX, it’s reportedly now planning to list in the U.S. Another miner manufacturer, Canaan Creative, is also reported to have already confidentially filed in the U.S. after a failed HKEX attempt. “

Bitcoin Miner Maker Canaan Confidentially Files for IPO in US: Report

Bitcoin Miner Canaan’s IPO Likely Delayed After Hong Kong Filing Expires

“The Reuters report, citing anonymous sources, further said the HKEX and financial regulators in Hong Kong have raised questions over Canaan’s business model, given the volatile nature of cryptocurrencies. As such, the news agency said the IPO might not go ahead this year, since there have been no updates from a listing hearing with the HKEX. “

So seems to be Caanan is having a hard time finding funding for their endeavors. Pretty much every single article on Coindesk about them is about them trying to get funding and failing at it.

So do they have enough money to bring the V10 to market AND bring enough V10s to be a problem?

They would need to produce 45,000 units to get 50% of the Ethereum mining power.

Current network is 197TH/s

Currently Bitmain is estimated to have produced less than 20,000 units since the Antminer E3’s announcement in April 2018.

Bitmain Confirms Release of First Ethereum ASIC Miners

Bitmain being a much larger company than Canaan, it seems unlikely they will produce 45,000 units quick enough to become a problem.


For those of you that don’t know, Canaan manages the Avalon bitcoin ASICs and have done so since 2014. Canaan is fulling in charge of Avalon.

Maybe I should’ve said that sooner, I don’t know. I’m just typing as I come up with stuff.

But we can look at Avalon’s bitcoin past to determine what the future ethereum miner supply might look like. Keep in mind though, this was also during a time when they were well-funded.

I’m not sure what their bank account looks like now, but they have been in the red every year since their existance, so I have to assume they have less money now than when they were releasing bitcoin miners

Avalon announce the A10 March 2019, and started shipping pre-orders in October 2019.

If the V10 follows suit, we won’t see a V10 in the hands of miners until April 2020

Wait for October: New Bitcoin Miner Demand Is Again Outstripping Supply

Ok, I’m done. That’s all I put together and why I don’t believe the Canaan ASIC that was announced is a concern warranting the immediate adoption of ProgPoW

Thanks for reading.

Source link

Register at Binance

Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum
Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum
Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum
Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum

Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum

Canaan's New ASIC Is A Pipe Dream, Not An Ethereum Threat : Ethereum